Conversing Across the Divide: Viewpoints on Migration and Culture
Introducing the Individuals
Stephen, sixty-four, Canvey Island
Profession: Former insurance professional
Voting record: Usually Tory, apart from when he resided in a left-leaning London borough and supported the SDP
Interesting fact: His specialty in insurance was kidnap and ransom: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re discussing rescuing people from South Korea because the North Koreans have activated the weapon systems”
Eva, 25, London
Occupation: Graduate in psychology
Political history: In her native land, Aotearoa, she voted a combination of progressive parties
Amuse bouche: Eva has worked as a singer on ocean liners; her most extended voyage was half a year, which is a significant duration to be on a boat
For starters
She: Steve seemed there to have a nice time, to be receptive
He: She came across as a very intelligent, articulate, nice person
She: I had a caprese salad, mushroom pasta, and a rich sweet treat, it was delicious
The big beef
Eva: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He believes that UK residents who are native to the area, including non-white Caucasian Britons, face limited access to the essential services, because increasing numbers are entering. Whereas I just disagree that the numbers are so problematic
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I have no desire to reside in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I maintain that authorities have exploited immigration to fill the jobs they can’t get people to do without increasing salaries. Wages are suppressed, so levies have to be kept low, so we can’t do things better – spend more money on child support, on education, on innovation
Eva: I am not deeply informed of the EU referendum, because I was 16 and abroad when it happened. He clarified it to me in a new light. He told me about “posted workers” – people could come here and only be paid the salary of the country they came from
He: Macron spent two years getting the EU to abolish the system; it was reformed in two thousand eighteen. Previously, migrant laborers coming in were undercutting local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, farms. She grasped that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was earning significantly higher than international colleagues
Common ground
Steve: It would be ideal to have a different energy source, come off of oil. I disapprove of environmental harm, I love the clean air, I love the countryside. We agreed on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their energy revenues skyrocketed after the conflict began, they allocated those funds to build eco-friendly systems
Eva: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s an unfavorable approach to proceed. He was supportive of maintaining domestic drilling for the small amount we’ll need in the future. I kind of agree with him. We’re still going to rely on air travel. We both think we should be moving towards environmentally friendly options, windfarms and hydro
For afters
Eva: We touched on anti-Muslim sentiment, though we avoided labeling it. He seemed worried by radical ideologies entering – he did mention that a lot of the people in Middle Eastern countries were radical, which I didn’t think accurate. I think it’s prejudiced to make judgments based on faith
Steve: I come from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been gentrified. Naturally, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I appear out of place. People stare at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She gave a slight glance at me about that. I used the word segregated area. Eva’s got Polish-Jewish ancestry – she doesn’t like that word, to her it denotes poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I consented to substitute a different word – maybe community?
She: I feel like Muslim people are really overrepresented in the media as doing things wrong. It appears a somewhat racist, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
Steve: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the train stop
Eva: We both said that we’d had a wonderful evening