🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.